The statistics of higher divorce rates among younger couples do not frighten evangelicals, because they believe that God will bless their marriage for following his laws or for simply being believers. There are those who believe true Christian marriages cannot fail, because they have figured out God's design for marriage, and as long as husband and wife follow the roles God has laid out for every man and woman, any couple can make it work. Happiness in marriage is something derived from obedience to God rather than relationship with your spouse. Of course, many married Christians boast about their healthy relationship with their spouse as a source of happiness, but they almost always attribute it to God blessing their union, or God having hand-picked the perfect spouse for them.
Not all Christians are marrying young. As the mainstream culture marries later and later, so do many Christians. They face the same career choices and economic struggles. They share the modern notions of waiting to marry the right person for love. They have the same options to lead a fun and adventurous life in their 20s, free of the need to settle down immediately. But when they struggle with sexual purity--that desire to be intimate with another person or to satisfy the biological urge for sex--the church's one-size-fits-all solution is to get married. To them, it's really the only option to avoid sexual sin or the struggles and loneliness that come from avoiding that sin.
A good example of this is an article printed in Christianity Today in 2009. Mark Regnarus recognizes all the problems with purity teachings and asking young Christians to go against their natural sexual urges. In fact, his common-sense assessment of the problems made me hopeful that he would have an equally common-sense solution, despite the title of the article.
Most young Americans no longer think of marriage as a formative institution, but rather as the institution they enter once they think they are fully formed. Increasing numbers of young evangelicals think likewise, and, by integrating these ideas with the timeless imperative to abstain from sex before marriage, we've created a new optimal life formula for our children: Marriage is glorious, and a big deal. But it must wait. And with it, sex. Which is seldom as patient.As an aside: I am one of those that prefers to enter marriage once fully formed. I know not all people see it that way nor want it that way, but for me, I believe that with maturity comes the ability to have healthier relationships and make better choices.
Regnarus spends the rest of the article making a case for why early marriage really isn't that bad and how we can make it better and easier for young Christians to be successful with their young marriages. I will admit I was disappointed that that was the only solution offered, though I know I should not have expected anything else. Regnarus' belief that marriage is a covenant and that sex outside of it is a sin is so widely accepted as God's law that there really aren't any other options for a traditional bible-believing Christian to offer.
I see the Christianity Today article as a classic example of our interpretation of scripture creating unbending rules that do not consider humanity. I picture God's Law as a stone wall built along a a large body of water. The water is humanity, and no matter how many times the waves, following their natural flow, crash against the wall, it does not budge.
I know that the rules we create for following God's law derive from our interpretation of the bible, because we believe the bible to be the only authoritative source of truth. But what if we also used God's creation as an equal source of truth? How would valuing natural human tendencies and instincts influence our interpretation of God's will for us? Things like fornication and homosexuality might no longer be a problem for Christians, because they would no longer be considered sins at all. Telling someone to marry young or suffer the consequences wouldn't be necessary, because Christians could live happy lives in or out of marriage without fear of God's disapproval.
To most conservative Christians I know, the above paragraph sounds like the worst heresy. But that is where I am at right now. Letting go of biblical inerrancy and sola scriptura was scary for me, but I found that my faith did not depend on it. There is always the possibility that we have interpreted the bible wrong, no matter how confident the current thinkers of the day are in their assessment. I also like to think that Jesus freed us from many more laws than we give him credit for.